The Absurdity of Contests and Judging in the Arts

Contests in creative fields are oxymorons. Attempting to objectively score a subjective artistic medium is futile. Crowd sourcing scoring merely accelerates a march to the lowest common denominator.

A very perceptive article by Stephen Dougherty [1] describes three common scenarios where judging of art contests is skewed by the preconceptions of the judges:

  1. Competitions sponsored by artist-run organization that are judged by a committee of signature members, officers, and/or "master" artists. The competitions help to perpetuate the standards held by the those invested members. This scenario describes the subjective, egocentric, and pompous judging of "photo competitions" sponsored by the Professional Photographers of America.
  2. An unaffiliated artist who is admired by a majority of people in the host organization is invited to serve as the only juror or awards judge. In these situations, the juror's prior knowledge of an applicant's artwork or his/her personal relationship with that applicant is added to the set of standards used in selecting winners
  3. Museum curators, published critics, or university professors serve as jurors and awards judges. In those cases, the final selection is almost impossible to forecast.

{1] Dougherty, Stephen. "Art Competitions: Unfair, Prejudicial, and Motivating." Stevedoreart.Com. 11 April 2018, stevedohertyart.com/blog/132116/art-competitions-unfair-prejudicial-and-motivating.

Jeffrey Sward, December 2017. Revised July 2019.